Handy Links
Primer on Article 78's.    
   
Important Links to DHCR's Site: 

DHCR Operations and Services (DHCR) 

 Fair Market Rent Appeals (DHCR) 

Succession Rights (DHCR) 

Application of Treble Damage Penalty in Rent Overcharges (DHCR) 

Filing a PAR (Petitioner for Administrative Review (DHCR) 

DHCR Rent Administration and Borough Office Addresses 
 

 
DHCR Proceedings 
Rent Stabilization and Rent Control Issues in the City of New York 
Intro
Case Studies
Department of Housing and Community Renewal (“DHCR”) is the agency that administers over rent-controlled and rent-stabilized apartments in New York City.  In such apartments, the landlord is only permitted to charge a certain amount of rent according to guidelines which are established on a year-to-year basis by the Rent Guidelines Board.  Disputes as to the amounts of rent charged are adjudicated in one of several extremely convoluted administrative proceedings in front of DHCR. 

The Article 78 proceeding is the tenant’s secret weapon against an arbitrary ruling of DHCR.  On a number of occasions, DHCR has re-drafted its own rules as a result of a tenant’s successful Article 78 litigation. 
 

OVERCHARGES 

If the landlord is overcharging a tenant, the tenant must file an overcharge complaint with DHCR within four years from when the overcharge began.  DHCR is usually pretty fair on the overcharge complaints, but they take FOREVER to decide your case.  If you have been overcharged, you are entitled to a refund of the rent that was illegally taken from you.  In most cases, you are entitled to treble damages (three times the refund) against the landlord.  Although DHCR may disagree, you are entitled under New York law to interest from the date of the overcharge determination. 

 

Owner's Tender of Partial Refund Does Not Extinguish Claim for Treble Damages 

Owner Fails to Provide Evidence of Inadvertent Mathematical Error When it Simply Makes a Bare Assertion That an Error Was Made. 

Requests for Consolidation 
 
WebWatch
RENT STABILIZATION ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,AND SMALL PROPERTY OWNERS OF NEW YORK, INTERVENOR-APPELLANT, v. 
RICHARD L. HIGGINS, &C., ESPONDENT, AND ROBERT WELLS, ET AL.,INTERVENORS- RESPONDENTS. 
83 N.Y.2d 156, 630 N.E.2d 626, 608 N.Y.S.2d 930 (1993). 
December 21, 1993  
Essentially two challenges are mounted by appellant-property owners to regulations promulgated by respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) enlarging the class of "family members" entitled to succeed to a rent-regulated apartment on the death or departure of the tenant of record. As did the Appellate Division, we conclude first that the regulations are within the agency's rulemaking authority, and second that no unconstitutional "taking" was effected. 
 
 

 
Tenant Can Challenge Apt. Deregulation 
New York Law Journal 
Friday, September 17, 1999 
"A TENANT whose apartment was deregulated after she allegedly failed to provide 
proof that her income was below a legal threshold for rent stabilization should get 
another chance to show that the deregulation was in error, a state appellate 
court ruled yesterday."  
 
 Home | Contact Us | About Article78.com | Links

Steven De Castro, Esq., represents clients in Article 78 proceedings before New York State Supreme Court. To find out how the statements made on this site may be applicable to your situation, request a case evaluation by clicking on the Case Evaluation page.  

Date: July 24, 2001 Steven De Castro © 2001, All Rights Reserved. The representations made are accurate to the best of the author's knowledge on the day of publication, but readers should note that laws and regulations constantly change and are subject to different interpretations. For legal advice applicable to your situation, see an attorney. The statements on this page expire one year after publication.