Primer
on Article 78's.
Important Links to DHCR's Site:
DHCR
Operations and Services (DHCR)
Fair
Market Rent Appeals (DHCR)
Succession
Rights (DHCR)
Application
of Treble Damage Penalty in Rent Overcharges (DHCR)
Filing
a PAR (Petitioner for Administrative Review (DHCR)
DHCR
Rent Administration and Borough Office Addresses
|
DHCR Proceedings
Rent Stabilization and
Rent Control Issues
in the City of New York
|
Intro
|
Case Studies
|
| Department
of Housing and Community Renewal (“DHCR”) is the agency that administers
over rent-controlled and rent-stabilized apartments in New York City.
In such apartments, the landlord is only permitted to charge a certain
amount of rent according to guidelines which are established on a year-to-year
basis by the Rent Guidelines Board. Disputes as to the amounts of
rent charged are adjudicated in one of several extremely convoluted administrative
proceedings in front of DHCR.
The Article 78 proceeding
is the tenant’s secret weapon against an arbitrary ruling of DHCR.
On a number of occasions, DHCR has re-drafted its own rules as a result
of a tenant’s successful Article 78 litigation.
OVERCHARGES
If the landlord is overcharging
a tenant, the tenant must file an overcharge complaint with DHCR within
four years from when the overcharge began. DHCR is usually pretty
fair on the overcharge complaints, but they take FOREVER to decide your
case. If you have been overcharged, you are entitled to a refund
of the rent that was illegally taken from you. In most cases, you
are entitled to treble damages (three times the refund) against the landlord.
Although DHCR may disagree, you are entitled under New York law to interest
from the date of the overcharge determination.
|
Owner's
Tender of Partial Refund Does Not Extinguish Claim for Treble Damages
Owner
Fails to Provide Evidence of Inadvertent Mathematical Error When
it Simply Makes a Bare Assertion That an Error Was Made.
Requests
for Consolidation
|
WebWatch
|
RENT
STABILIZATION ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,AND
SMALL PROPERTY OWNERS OF NEW YORK, INTERVENOR-APPELLANT, v.
RICHARD
L. HIGGINS, &C., ESPONDENT, AND ROBERT WELLS, ET AL.,INTERVENORS- RESPONDENTS.
83 N.Y.2d 156, 630 N.E.2d 626, 608 N.Y.S.2d 930 (1993).
December 21, 1993
Essentially two challenges are mounted by appellant-property
owners to regulations promulgated by respondent Division of Housing and
Community Renewal (DHCR) enlarging the class of "family members" entitled
to succeed to a rent-regulated apartment on the death or departure of the
tenant of record. As did the Appellate Division, we conclude first that
the regulations are within the agency's rulemaking authority, and second
that no unconstitutional "taking" was effected.
|
|
Tenant
Can Challenge Apt. Deregulation
New York Law Journal
Friday, September 17, 1999
"A TENANT whose apartment was deregulated after she allegedly
failed to provide
proof that her income was below a legal threshold for
rent stabilization should get
another chance to show that the deregulation was in error,
a state appellate
court ruled yesterday."
Home | Contact
Us | About Article78.com | Links
Steven
De Castro, Esq., represents clients in Article 78 proceedings before New
York State Supreme Court. To find out how the statements made on this site
may be applicable to your situation, request a case evaluation by clicking
on the Case Evaluation page. |
|
Date: July 24, 2001 Steven De Castro © 2001, All Rights Reserved. The representations
made are accurate to the best of the author's knowledge on the day of publication,
but readers should note that laws and regulations constantly change and are
subject to different interpretations. For legal advice applicable to your situation,
see an attorney. The statements on this page expire one year after publication.
|